good article. Too bad WSJ didn't do their homework. I have been to a few barns due to having to move, and needing to keep my horses close enough to visit daily. I only ever had drama at the first two. And the reason I had drama at the second one, was because the people creating the drama followed me to the next barn. I moved out of state (not because of them! lol) and got into another boarding facility. I only left them because they decided that they didn't want to board horses anymore, and just focus on their own. The last barn I was at was absolutely wonderful, and the only reason I left was because we got our own property, so the horses are with me 24/7. It is my dream.
"out of touch rich people"... REALLY?? WOW. Last time I checked, my horses were eating better than I do! 10 years ago I was fortunate to buy horse property so I don't have to deal with the boarding situation anymore. But when I was a boarder, I didn't perceive the goings-on as "drama". It's just more like lots of people trying to work around each other in the limited time that they each have. I think the WSJ should give us equestrians more credit! But then again, they're writing about a topic of which they know very little. Sorry, gotta go... need to go out and pamper my out of touch rich horses!!
The WSJ has too much time on its hands. There are more important things to explore, write about, that yes, are horse related and truly inspirational. People, no matter where they are , can set the stage for maturity, responsibility and fun!